Today, my friend sent me the news that the University of Leeds has fallen into the epidemic. In addition, in recent days, I have exchanged opinions with many netizens when talking about the new crown and the five major leagues on major platforms. Therefore, I personally have some thoughts and doubts. , I hope to share it with friends at station D, in order to play a role in attracting others. In the previous micro headlines and opinion sharing, many friends "taught" me that I cannot use "Chinese thinking" to substitute for thinking about the European epidemic. I couldn't help but wonder: First, in the face of the epidemic, instead of talking about the "Chinese-foreign thinking gap", it is better to stand from the perspective of the differences in the anti-epidemic strategies of various countries and try to clarify the reasons for the climax of the European epidemic. Those friends who keep talking about "Chinese-style thinking" and "European-American thinking", at first glance, few have even truly understood their "European and American thinking mode" in foreign countries. In other words, isn't this just some people arguing without shame about what they have unilaterally imagined? Secondly, from the perspective of facts, the current anti-epidemic measures in European football are basically the same as those of European countries. Indeed, the economic loss of the suspension of the league last season was too great, and many clubs with a weak family background have lost several layers of skin. So from an economic point of view, I can also understand the position of where the five major leagues insist on playing. However, some friendly matches at the national team level are still too meaningless. In these friendly matches, the benefits and the risks taken are really not proportional. The clubs and the five major league operators are reluctant to stand up for the survival of the team. As for the national team, think twice and play cautiously. The above is purely personal opinion, please don't spray if you don't like it.
今天，我的朋友向我发送了一条消息，即利兹大学已经流行。此外，最近几天，我在主要平台上谈论新皇冠和五个主要联赛时与许多网民交换了意见。因此，我个人有一些想法和怀疑。 ，我希望与D站的朋友分享它，以起到吸引他人的作用。 在以前的小标题和观点分享中，许多朋友“教导”我不能用“中国思维”代替对欧洲流行病的思考。我忍不住想： 首先，面对这种流行病，与其谈论“中外思维鸿沟”，不如从各国的抗流行病策略差异的角度出发，并试图阐明造成这种情况的原因，那是更好的选择。欧洲流行的高潮。乍一看那些一直在谈论“中国式思维”和“欧足彩竞彩500美思维”的朋友，很少有人真正了解他们在国外的“欧美思维模式”。换句话说，难道这不仅仅是一些人为自己单方面想象的内容而感到羞耻而争论吗？ 其次，从事实的角度来看，目前欧洲足球的防流行措施与欧洲国家基本相同。的确，上赛季联赛停赛造成的经济损失太大，许多家庭背景薄弱的俱乐部失去了几层皮。因此，从经济角度来看，我也足彩竞彩500可以理解五个大联盟坚持比赛的位置。但是，在国家队一级的一些友谊赛仍然没有意义。在这些友谊赛中，收益和承担的风险确实不成比例。俱乐部和五个主要的联赛运营商都不愿意为球队的生存而奋斗。至于国家队，三思而后行要谨慎。 以上纯属个人观点，如果您不喜欢，请勿喷洒。